• Why not take a moment to introduce yourself to our members?

cdeakle

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Should I:

a) Place the out probe after the DI cartridge and then verify with my handheld TDS meter

-or-

b) Place the out probe after the RO membrane and then check the output from the DI cartridge with my handheld TDS meter?
 

liquid

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'd put one probe after the RO membrane and the other one after the DI cartridge. That way you can tell when both are going bad. No point in really testing what the TDS of your incoming water is as it really doesn't matter in relation to when to change filters or membranes.

Shane
 

GSchiemer

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I use the TDS meter to measure the effectiveness of my RO membrane, which is my biggest concern. I placed one probe before the membrane and one after. I don't need to measure the effectiveness of the DI because it uses color-changing resins.

Greg
 

tangir1

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
See the reply for the thread:
http://reefs.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=485268#485268

tangir1":13651p16 said:
>... I'm thinking it might be best to plumb the first sensor in after the prefilters - directly before the RO.

That's right. Again, the product was marketed for RO rejection ratio, so you want the probe to be right before and right after the RO membrane.

>...Should I put the second probe after the RO membrane or after the DI chamber ...

Again, I doubt that it is useful for DI, but so far, no one has give any number compare the reading in DI water.
 

tangir1

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
>...I don't need to measure the effectiveness of the DI because it uses color-changing resins.

Greg, don't be too confident in that unless you have two DI cartidges one after another.
 

cdeakle

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'd put one probe after the RO membrane and the other one after the DI cartridge. That way you can tell when both are going bad. No point in really testing what the TDS of your incoming water is as it really doesn't matter in relation to when to change filters or membranes.

I like this idea. With this placement I would know the effectiveness of my RO membrane and the effectiveness of my DI cartridge and wether either of them needs to be changed out. I agree, I don't really care about the incoming TDS as long as the end result is 0 TDS! :D

That's right. Again, the product was marketed for RO rejection ratio, so you want the probe to be right before and right after the RO membrane.

This comment has me thinking twice about the above statement. Which one of these would you guys recommend??
 

tangir1

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
420puff, until some other people post about the readings of the dual meter against another TDS meter, or until I have time to do a calibration (need to order new solution), don't take the reading of the meter with too much confidence. Again, the relative reading seems to be fine, since it is 30% higher consistently for the meter I got. See your thread for detail.

One thing to keep in mind is that TDS meter should have temperature compensation, and a simple two-pronge probe in this and other comon TDS meters used in this hobby just barely cut it for RO and tap water monitoring. I had been warning the use of TDS meter for DI water application, but so far, no one had came forward and admit that I am right about the misapplication.
 

GSchiemer

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
tangir1":1oc6cfmj said:
>...I don't need to measure the effectiveness of the DI because it uses color-changing resins.

Greg, don't be too confident in that unless you have two DI cartidges one after another.

I do use dual DI cartridges, which is the proper way to employ these filters.

As long as my RO membrane maintains a rejection ration of over 98%, I'm not overly concerned about the DI cartridges.

Greg
 

cdeakle

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ok,

So I added probe #1 after the RO membrane and #2 after the DI cartridge. Both gave a reading of 0. My handheld TDS also gave me a reading of 0 for the product water as well.

This can't be right. Too good to be true :wink:
 

kim

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
A little too good to be true !

Tangir, what is your concern about using TDS meters to check DI water ? I suspect that you need one which can be calibrated to this end of the scale, and I would prefer just a simple conductivity reading (since the conversion from conductivity to TDS will be quite bogus in this application). But otherwise, should be okay I would have thought.

I tried to follow yor link but it's a little ....umm...weird !

kim
 

tangir1

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
kim:
Thanx for the heads up. The post was updated, and the link is http://reefs.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=485268#485268.

My concern for TDS meter for DI is that is will often give you a "0" reading due to underranging. Regular TDS meter is not designed to monitor low conductivity fluid like DI water. Another issue is the accuracy. At 2% of the scale (typical accuracy for hobby meters), the TDS reading can be off as much as 20 ppm.

I am not particularly antigostic toward the use of TDS meter for DI water, but just want everyone to be aware of the issue if they decide to do it, and not spread the misuse/abuse without caveat.
 

kim

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Absolutely agreed. When I'm using my probe for freshwater I calibrate to 84 and 1,413 microS/cm, which seems a reasonable range when I want to measure tap, RO and DI. Also easily obtained (Hanna make these) - I have found low range calibration fluids but minimum order on these is a few litres.....

But even then, I am sure that the DI reading can be out. I do tend to watch for changes rather than the absolute value.

kim
 

tangir1

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The reason that people usually buy large volumn of low range fluids is that you really need to use the calibration fluid to risen and clean the probe very, very well before you do the calibration. Even a slight amount of contaminant can increase the conductivity a lot.

For low conductivity fluid (DI water), I use resisitivity meter instead of conductivity meter. Even the CO2 in air can affect the DI resistivity/conductivity a lot.
 

kim

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Oh oh.....I get very confused about resistivity meters..

Conductivity is just the reciprocal of resistivity, so the difference should just be a display issue (in the same way as a TDS and conductivity meter really do the same thing, but the TDS meter does a conversion).

Perhaps in the "world of testing" there's some kind of concensus that a different technique is used when referring to one or another, but since that isn't made explicit I am lost. And I keep asking the question !

What is the material difference in technique/theory (ie not referring to the choice of display) ?

kim
 

tangir1

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
>... but since that isn't made explicit I am lost. And I keep asking the question ! ...

In one of my former lifes, I thought I already iron out the issues between resistivity and conductivity with you in private, kim. :?

Anyway, as I mentioned before, the main difference are the way temperature compensation is done, the choice of solution standard(resistivity use NaCl, TDS people use 442, and conductivity people use KCl), and the way the temp. comp'ed conductivity is convert into the appropriate unit (uS, ohm, or tds)
 

kim

Experienced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Aaaaah...it's you. In disguise (you look much younger by the way).

We aren't going to agree on this one !

Peace, respect !

kim
 

tangir1

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There is not much to agree or disagree with, since it is all engineering. But if you look at it in purely theoretically/scientifically way, then yes, conductivity = inv(resistivity) and end of story.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I put one prior to the whole unit

and the other after the DI

I have 50 going in, and 0 coming out

I'm going to move the 2nd one before the DI and see if I get any reading there


Trouble is, I really dont care if there's a reading prior to the DI, I just want to know when the DI needs replacing.
 

tangir1

Advanced Reefer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
>... I really dont care if there's a reading prior to the DI,

I hope they have a three electrode model (which you can DIY, BTW), ...the problem is that if the membrane got ruined, you want to be able to notice it ASAP. With the DI right behind it, you going to get good water until the resin is ruined, and you will ended up wonder why a cartidge of it that used to last half a year now only good for one or two water changes....
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I ran without RO for so many years it's not a big issue for me, I used 4 prefilters and then the 2 DI's, works pretty good but they do wear out faster
 

Sponsor Reefs

We're a FREE website, and we exist because of hobbyists like YOU who help us run this community.

Click here to sponsor $10:


Top